Knowing how to manage others starts by knowing how to manage yourself. Each of us starts with existing preferences, workstyles and aptitudes that may be different from the people we manage, and having a framework to help determine what the best approach is for a given team or individual can make what you already may know how to do that much faster and more efficient.
Leadership styles is a complex topic and there is no right or wrong style, no silver bullet. Each will have its advantages and disadvantages. And it is your job as a manger to recognise when and how to use each one.
First, lets look at the most common forms of leadership style categories that exist:
Dictatorial style
This is when a manager is operating like a dictator. They make all the decisions, how things are done, when things are done. And if you fail to follow them, you will be severely disciplined or punished. They do not allow others to question a decision they have made or their authority. Some more passive manager that use this style may cloud their unrealistic demands in humour, or allow questions about decisions (on the surface) but ignores them.
Needless to say, you should avoid using this style. It’s only advantage is to be used in extreme emergencies, for example, when an employee safety is at risk, or when sever disciplinary action needs to be taken.
Authoritative style
People who like to keep control. Many managers opt for this style of management. This type of manager feels he/she is the most qualified and experienced and considers his/her point of view as the most valid. They do not have confidence in the ability of others and rarely give recognition. This person is action orientated and highly competitive. And uses others for his/her benefit. These managers produce ACTION when needed.
This is a good style to use with new hires who are unfamiliar with their jobs. Or if there is constant misuse of authority, or when company rules are broken. So this style will produce great results in a short amount of time, but long term use will decrease productivity and job will become repetitive.
Consultive
This manager uses the skills and experiences and ideas of others, and involve them in problem solving. But they will still retain final decision making power. They will tend not to make major decisions before consulting with those that will be affected.
This manager delegates, but keeps “veto power”, retaining the right for final decision. So they look at all alternatives, before final decision is made. This is best used when you need creative problem solving.
Participative
These managers share control. Many feel uncomfortable with this style because most of the authority is given to the team. Everyone’s input is considered and the leader acts as a coach/player, sometimes accepting the teams’ ideas over his/her own. The focus here is on stimulating creativity.
You can use this style when you have a competent team and when you need creativity and innovative work or when motivating top managers.
so..
No one right model for leadership style assessments seems to exist. Harvard Business Review says key leadership types include: Pace-setting, Authoritative, Affiliative, Coaching, Coercive, and Democratic. Forbes Magazine suggests the four leadership styles are: Pragmatist, Idealist, Steward and Diplomat. Inc Magazine begs to differ and says managers have to manage all four styles: Directive, Participative, Laissez-Faire, Adaptive. The well-established Situational Leadership model holds that “modes of being” is most relevant: Directing, Coaching, Supporting, Delegating. Often different systems take into account various aspects of the work environment as well as team experience.
Having said that, Meyers Brigg Temperament Indictor (MBTI) is the most well-established with 89 out of the Fortune 100 companies using it. Created by a mother and daughter team during World War II to help women entering the industrial workforce for the first time determine the best fit war-time job for them, MBTI is based on Jungian archetypes and specifically designed to be applied to the work environment. Jung created some of the best known psychological concepts, including the archetype, the collective unconscious, the complex, and extraversion and introversion. Although many of MBTI’s claims have been scientifically debunked, it is useful to know as one of the most common workstyle assessments and similar to any system also based on Jungian principles.
The usefulness of knowing your own style to be a more effective manager is three-fold:
A brief overview of the terms so when they show up in your test results, you have an idea of what they mean:
Attitudes
Information Gathering Functions
Decision-Making Functions
Lifestyle Preferences
Rather than list all 16 MBTI styles, for both how you prefer to lead and how your team members may prefer to be led – we’ve designed the exercises below to help you focus on the key relationships that will make the most difference to your being successful in your new role.
The link below can help you understand how to manage an introverted team when you’re an extrovert or vice versa. It can help you more consciously bridge to your direct manager or peer or team member when you may have a very different preferred approach. In any case, it means that the golden rule doesn’t necessarily work – in that we cannot safely assume that others want to be led in exactly the same way we do because they may have very different workstyle preferences from us.
Exercises
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
Don't worry, your information will not be shared.
50% Complete
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.